From 3b0bc80cc9a48f9ac3409342a1a46c6069cb6c67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jack Halford Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:15:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] 12 done --- ...l-energy-from-the-period-of-oscillation.md | 108 +++++++++--------- 1/equations/12.1.tex | 1 + 1/equations/12.2.tex | 1 + 1/index.md | 2 +- Makefile | 1 + tools/template.html | 2 +- 6 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) create mode 100644 1/equations/12.1.tex create mode 100644 1/equations/12.2.tex diff --git a/1/12-determination-of-the-potential-energy-from-the-period-of-oscillation.md b/1/12-determination-of-the-potential-energy-from-the-period-of-oscillation.md index 829d329..0c08fcf 100644 --- a/1/12-determination-of-the-potential-energy-from-the-period-of-oscillation.md +++ b/1/12-determination-of-the-potential-energy-from-the-period-of-oscillation.md @@ -2,56 +2,60 @@ title: 12. Determination of the potential energy from the period of oscillation --- -Let us consider to what extent the form of the potential energy U(x) of a -field in which a particle is oscillating can be deduced from a knowledge of the -period of oscillation T as a function of the energy E. Mathematically, this -involves the solution of the integral equation (11.5), in which U(x) is regarded -as unknown and T(E) as known. -We shall assume that the required function U(x) has only one minimum -in the region of space considered, leaving aside the question whether there -exist solutions of the integral equation which do not meet this condition. -For convenience, we take the origin at the position of minimum potential -energy, and take this minimum energy to be zero (Fig. 7). -U -U=E -121U -X -X1 -X2 -FIG. 7 -28 -Integration of the Equations of Motion -§12 -In the integral (11.5) we regard the co-ordinate x as a function of U. The -function x(U) is two-valued: each value of the potential energy corresponds -to two different values of X. Accordingly, the integral (11.5) must be divided -into two parts before replacing dx by (dx/dU) dU: one from x = X1 to x = 0 -and the other from x = 0 to X = X2. We shall write the function x(U) in -these two ranges as x = x1(U) and x = x2(U) respectively. -The limits of integration with respect to U are evidently E and 0, so that -we have -T(E) = -= -If both sides of this equation are divided by V(a - E), where a is a parameter, -and integrated with respect to E from 0 to a, the result is -dUdE +Let us consider to what extent the form of the potential energy $U(x)$ of a field in which a particle is oscillating can be deduced from a knowledge of the period of oscillation $T$ as a function of the energy $E$. Mathematically, this involves the solution of the integral equation `1/11.5`, in which $U(x)$ is regarded +as unknown and $T(E)$ as known. +We shall assume that the required function $U(x)$ has only one minimum in the region of space considered, leaving aside the question whether there exist solutions of the integral equation which do not meet this condition. For convenience, we take the origin at the position of minimum potential +energy, and take this minimum energy to be zero `1/fig7`. + +In the integral `1/11.5` we regard the co-ordinate $x$ as a function of $U$. The function $x(U)$ is two-valued: each value of the potential energy corresponds to two different values of $X$. Accordingly, the integral `1/11.5` must be divided into two parts before replacing $dx$ by $(dx/dU) dU$: one from $x = x_1$ to $x = 0$ and the other from $x = 0$ to $x = x_2$. We shall write the function $x(U)$ in these two ranges as $x = x_1(U)$ and $x = x_2(U)$ respectively. + +The limits of integration with respect to $U$ are evidently $E$ and $0$, so that we have + +\begin{align} +T(E) =& +\sqrt{2m}\int_0^E\frac{\dd{x_2}(U)}{\dd{U}}\frac{\dd{U}}{\sqrt{E-U}} + +\sqrt{2m}\int_E^0\frac{\dd{x_1}(U)}{\dd{U}}\frac{\dd{U}}{\sqrt{E-U}} \\ +=& +\sqrt{2m}\int_0^E\left[\frac{\dd{x_2}}{\dd{U}}-\frac{\dd{x_1}}{\dd{U}})\right] +\frac{\dd{U}}{\sqrt{E-U}} +\end{align} + +If both sides of this equation are divided by $\sqrt{\alpha - E}$, where $\alpha$ is a parameter, and integrated with respect to $E$ from $0$ to $\alpha$, the result is + +$$ +\int_0^\alpha\frac{T(E)\dd{E}}{\sqrt{\alpha-E}} +=\sqrt{2m}\int_0^\alpha\int_0^E +\left[\frac{\dd{x_2}}{\dd{U}}-\frac{\dd{x_1}}{\dd{U}})\right] +\frac{\dd{U}\dd{E}}{\sqrt{(\alpha-E)(E-U)}} +$$ + or, changing the order of integration, -dE -The integral over E is elementary; its value is TT. The integral over U is -thus trivial, and we have -since x2(0) = x1(0) = 0. Writing U in place of a, we obtain the final result: -(12.1) -Thus the known function T(E) can be used to determine the difference -x2(U)-x1(U). - The functions x2(U) and x1(U) themselves remain indeter- -minate. This means that there is not one but an infinity of curves U = U(x) -§13 -The reduced mass -29 -which give the prescribed dependence of period on energy, and differ in such -a way that the difference between the two values of x corresponding to each -value of U is the same for every curve. -The indeterminacy of the solution is removed if we impose the condition -that the curve U = U(x) must be symmetrical about the U-axis, i.e. that -x2(U) = 1(U) III x(U). In this case, formula (12.1) gives for x(U) the -unique expression -(12.2) + +$$ +\int_0^\alpha\frac{T(E)\dd{E}}{\sqrt{\alpha-E}} +=\sqrt{2m}\int_0^\alpha +\left[\frac{\dd{x_2}}{\dd{U}}-\frac{\dd{x_1}}{\dd{U}})\right]\dd{U} +\int_U^\alpha +\frac{\dd{E}}{\sqrt{(\alpha-E)(E-U)}} +$$ + +The integral over $E$ is elementary; its value is $\pi$. The integral over $U$ is thus trivial, and we have + +$$ +\int_0^\alpha\frac{T(E)\dd{E}}{\sqrt{\alpha-E}} +=\pi\sqrt{2m}\left[ x_2(\alpha)-x_1(\alpha)\right], +$$ + +since $x_2(0) = x_1(0) = 0$. Writing $U$ in place of $\alpha$, we obtain the final result: + +```load +1/12.1 +``` + +Thus the known function $T(E)$ can be used to determine the difference $x_2(U)-x_1(U)$. The functions $x_2(U)$ and $x1(U)$ themselves remain indeterminate. This means that there is not one but an infinity of curves $U = U(x)$ which give the prescribed dependence of period on energy, and differ in such a way that the difference between the two values of $x$ corresponding to each value of $U$ is the same for every curve. + +The indeterminacy of the solution is removed if we impose the condition that the curve $U = U(x)$ must be symmetrical about the $U$-axis, i.e. that $x_2(U) = -x_1(U) \equiv x(U)$. In this case, formula `1/12.1` gives for $x(U)$ the unique expression + +```load +1/12.2 +``` diff --git a/1/equations/12.1.tex b/1/equations/12.1.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d906f7e --- /dev/null +++ b/1/equations/12.1.tex @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +x_2(U)-x_1(U)=\frac{1}{\pi\sqrt{2m}}\int_0^U\frac{T(E)\dd{E}}{\sqrt{U-E}} diff --git a/1/equations/12.2.tex b/1/equations/12.2.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d8ac8f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/1/equations/12.2.tex @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +x(U)=\frac{1}{\pi\sqrt{2m}}\int_0^U\frac{T(E)\dd{E}}{\sqrt{U-E}} diff --git a/1/index.md b/1/index.md index 1a269fe..e0f6847 100644 --- a/1/index.md +++ b/1/index.md @@ -20,12 +20,12 @@ II. CONSERVATION LAWS III. INTEGRATION OF THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION 11. [Motion in one dimension](11-motion-in-one-dimension.html) +12. [Determination of the potential energy from the period of oscillation](12-determination-of-the-potential-energy-from-the-period-of-oscillation.html) 🚧 WORK IN PROGRESS BELOW THIS POINT 🚧 -12. [Determination of the potential energy from the period of oscillation](12-determination-of-the-potential-energy-from-the-period-of-oscillation.html) 13. [The reduced mass](13-the-reduced-mass.html) 14. [Motion in a central field](14-motion-in-a-central-field.html) 15. [Kepler's problem]() diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index a4fc71f..63e8b04 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ deploy: PROD=true $(MAKE) re . <(pass export/RCLONE_CONFIG/cloudflare-god) rclone -v sync out/ r2:llcotp/ + make clean diff --git a/tools/template.html b/tools/template.html index 6607973..4dcfdf1 100644 --- a/tools/template.html +++ b/tools/template.html @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ - index + index $if(goatcounter)$