168 lines
9 KiB
Text
168 lines
9 KiB
Text
must cyclically permute the suffixes 1, 2, 3 to 3, 1, 2. Substitution of (1) in these formulae
|
|
then gives cos 0 = tanh T, = lot + constant, tan =
|
|
It is seen from these formulae that, as t 8, the vector SC asymptotically approaches the
|
|
x2-axis, which itself asymptotically approaches the Z-axis.
|
|
$38. Rigid bodies in contact
|
|
The equations of motion (34.1) and (34.3) show that the conditions of
|
|
equilibrium for a rigid body can be written as the vanishing of the total force
|
|
and total torque on the body:
|
|
F = f = 0 ,
|
|
K ==~rxf=0. =
|
|
(38.1)
|
|
Here the summation is over all the external forces acting on the body, and r
|
|
is the radius vector of the "point of application"; the origin with respect to
|
|
which the torque is defined may be chosen arbitrarily, since if F = 0 the
|
|
value of K does not depend on this choice (see (34.5)).
|
|
If we have a system of rigid bodies in contact, the conditions (38.1) for
|
|
each body separately must hold in equilibrium. The forces considered must
|
|
include those exerted on each body by those with which it is in contact. These
|
|
forces at the points of contact are called reactions. It is obvious that the mutual
|
|
reactions of any two bodies are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.
|
|
In general, both the magnitudes and the directions of the reactions are
|
|
found by solving simultaneously the equations of equilibrium (38.1) for all the
|
|
bodies. In some cases, however, their directions are given by the conditions
|
|
of the problem. For example, if two bodies can slide freely on each other, the
|
|
reaction between them is normal to the surface.
|
|
If two bodies in contact are in relative motion, dissipative forces of friction
|
|
arise, in addition to the reaction.
|
|
There are two possible types of motion of bodies in contact-sliding and
|
|
rolling. In sliding, the reaction is perpendicular to the surfaces in contact,
|
|
and the friction is tangential. Pure rolling, on the other hand, is characterised
|
|
by the fact that there is no relative motion of the bodies at the point of
|
|
contact; that is, a rolling body is at every instant as it were fixed to the point
|
|
of contact. The reaction may be in any direction, i.e. it need not be normal
|
|
to the surfaces in contact. The friction in rolling appears as an additional
|
|
torque which opposes rolling.
|
|
If the friction in sliding is negligibly small, the surfaces concerned are
|
|
said to be perfectly smooth. If, on the other hand, only pure rolling without
|
|
sliding is possible, and the friction in rolling can be neglected, the surfaces
|
|
are said to be perfectly rough.
|
|
In both these cases the frictional forces do not appear explicitly in the pro-
|
|
blem, which is therefore purely one of mechanics. If, on the other hand, the
|
|
properties of the friction play an essential part in determining the motion,
|
|
then the latter is not a purely mechanical process (cf. $25).
|
|
Contact between two bodies reduces the number of their degrees of freedom
|
|
as compared with the case of free motion. Hitherto, in discussing such
|
|
§38
|
|
Rigid bodies in contact
|
|
123
|
|
problems, we have taken this reduction into account by using co-ordinates
|
|
which correspond directly to the actual number of degrees of freedom. In
|
|
rolling, however, such a choice of co-ordinates may be impossible.
|
|
The condition imposed on the motion of rolling bodies is that the velocities
|
|
of the points in contact should be equal; for example, when a body rolls on a
|
|
fixed surface, the velocity of the point of contact must be zero. In the general
|
|
case, this condition is expressed by the equations of constraint, of the form
|
|
E caide = 0,
|
|
(38.2)
|
|
where the Cai are functions of the co-ordinates only, and the suffix a denumer-
|
|
ates the equations. If the left-hand sides of these equations are not the total
|
|
time derivatives of some functions of the co-ordinates, the equations cannot
|
|
be integrated. In other words, they cannot be reduced to relations between the
|
|
co-ordinates only, which could be used to express the position of the bodies
|
|
in terms of fewer co-ordinates, corresponding to the actual number of degrees
|
|
of freedom. Such constraints are said to be non-holonomic, as opposed to
|
|
holonomic constraints, which impose relations between the co-ordinates only.
|
|
Let us consider, for example, the rolling of a sphere on a plane. As usual,
|
|
we denote by V the translational velocity (the velocity of the centre of the
|
|
sphere), and by Sa the angular velocity of rotation. The velocity of the point
|
|
of contact with the plane is found by putting r = - an in the general formula
|
|
V = +SXR; a is the radius of the sphere and n a unit vector along the
|
|
normal to the plane. The required condition is that there should be no sliding
|
|
at the point of contact, i.e.
|
|
V-aSxxn = 0.
|
|
(38.3)
|
|
This cannot be integrated: although the velocity V is the total time derivative
|
|
of the radius vector of the centre of the sphere, the angular velocity is not in
|
|
general the total time derivative of any co-ordinate. The constraint (38.3) is
|
|
therefore non-holonomic.t
|
|
Since the equations of non-holonomic constraints cannot be used to reduce
|
|
the number of co-ordinates, when such constraints are present it is necessary
|
|
to use co-ordinates which are not all independent. To derive the correspond-
|
|
ing Lagrange's equations, we return to the principle of least action.
|
|
The existence of the constraints (38.2) places certain restrictions on the
|
|
possible values of the variations of the co-ordinates: multiplying equations
|
|
(38.2) by St, we find that the variations dqi are not independent, but are
|
|
related by
|
|
(38.4)
|
|
t It may be noted that the similar constraint in the rolling of a cylinder is holonomic. In
|
|
that case the axis of rotation has a fixed direction in space, and hence la = do/dt is the total
|
|
derivative of the angle of rotation of the cylinder about its axis. The condition (38.3) can
|
|
therefore be integrated, and gives a relation between the angle and the co-ordinate of the
|
|
centre of mass.
|
|
124
|
|
Motion of a Rigid Body
|
|
§38
|
|
This must be taken into account in varying the action. According to
|
|
Lagrange's method of finding conditional extrema, we must add to the inte-
|
|
grand in the variation of the action
|
|
=
|
|
the left-hand sides of equations (38.4) multiplied by undetermined coeffici-
|
|
ents da (functions of the co-ordinates), and then equate the integral to zero.
|
|
In SO doing the variations dqi are regarded as entirely independent, and the
|
|
result is
|
|
(38.5)
|
|
These equations, together with the constraint equations (38.2), form a com-
|
|
plete set of equations for the unknowns qi and da.
|
|
The reaction forces do not appear in this treatment, and the contact of
|
|
the bodies is fully allowed for by means of the constraint equations. There
|
|
is, however, another method of deriving the equations of motion for bodies in
|
|
contact, in which the reactions are introduced explicitly. The essential feature
|
|
of this method, which is sometimes called d'Alembert's principle, is to write
|
|
for each of the bodies in contact the equations.
|
|
dP/dt==f,
|
|
(38.6)
|
|
wherein the forces f acting on each body include the reactions. The latter
|
|
are initially unknown and are determined, together with the motion of the
|
|
body, by solving the equations. This method is equally applicable for both
|
|
holonomic and non-holonomic constraints.
|
|
PROBLEMS
|
|
PROBLEM 1. Using d'Alembert's principle, find the equations of motion of a homogeneous
|
|
sphere rolling on a plane under an external force F and torque K.
|
|
SOLUTION. The constraint equation is (38.3). Denoting the reaction force at the point of
|
|
contact between the sphere and the plane by R, we have equations (38.6) in the form
|
|
u dV/dt = F+R,
|
|
(1)
|
|
dSu/dt = K-an xR,
|
|
(2)
|
|
where we have used the facts that P = V and, for a spherical top, M = ISE. Differentiating
|
|
the constraint equation (38.3) with respect to time, we have V = aS2xn. Substituting in
|
|
equation (1) and eliminating S by means of (2), we obtain (I/au)(F+R) = Kxn-aR+
|
|
+an(n . R), which relates R, F and K. Writing this equation in components and substitut-
|
|
ing I = zua2 (§32, Problem 2(b)), we have
|
|
R2 = -F2,
|
|
where the plane is taken as the xy-plane. Finally, substituting these expressions in (1), we
|
|
§38
|
|
Rigid bodies in contact
|
|
125
|
|
obtain the equations of motion involving only the given external force and torque:
|
|
dVx dt 7u 5 Ky
|
|
dt
|
|
The components Ox, Q2 y of the angular velocity are given in terms of Vx, Vy by the constraint
|
|
equation (38.3); for S2 we have the equation 2 dQ2/dt = K2, the z-component of equa-
|
|
tion (2).
|
|
PROBLEM 2. A uniform rod BD of weight P and length l rests against a wall as shown in
|
|
Fig. 52 and its lower end B is held by a string AB. Find the reaction of the wall and the ten-
|
|
sion in the string.
|
|
Rc
|
|
h
|
|
P
|
|
RB
|
|
T
|
|
A
|
|
B
|
|
FIG. 52
|
|
SOLUTION. The weight of the rod can be represented by a force P vertically downwards,
|
|
applied at its midpoint. The reactions RB and Rc are respectively vertically upwards and
|
|
perpendicular to the rod; the tension T in the string is directed from B to A. The solution
|
|
of the equations of equilibrium gives Rc = (Pl/4h) sin 2a, RB = P-Rcsin x, T = Rc cos a.
|
|
PROBLEM 3. A rod of weight P has one end A on a vertical plane and the other end B on
|
|
a horizontal plane (Fig. 53), and is held in position by two horizontal strings AD and BC,
|
|
RB
|
|
TA
|
|
A
|
|
RA
|
|
C
|
|
FIG. 53
|
|
126
|
|
Motion of a Rigid Body
|