250 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
250 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: 29-resonance-in-non-linear-oscillations
|
|
---
|
|
Resonance in non-linear oscillations
|
|
87
|
|
at the beginning of this section. Solving the inhomogeneous linear equation
|
|
in the usual way, we have
|
|
(28.12)
|
|
Putting in (28.11) X wo+w(2), we obtain the equa-
|
|
tion for x(3)
|
|
= -
|
|
or, substituting on the right-hand side (28.10) and (28.12) and effecting
|
|
simple transformation,
|
|
wt.
|
|
Equating to zero the coefficient of the resonance term cos wt, we find the
|
|
correction to the fundamental frequency, which is proportional to the squared
|
|
amplitude of the oscillations:
|
|
(28.13)
|
|
The combination oscillation of the third order is
|
|
(28.14)
|
|
$29. Resonance in non-linear oscillations
|
|
When the anharmonic terms in forced oscillations of a system are taken
|
|
into account, the phenomena of resonance acquire new properties.
|
|
Adding to the right-hand side of equation (28.9) an external periodic force
|
|
of frequency y, we have
|
|
+2x+wo2x=(fm)cos = yt - ax2-Bx3;
|
|
(29.1)
|
|
here the frictional force, with damping coefficient A (assumed small) has also
|
|
been included. Strictly speaking, when non-linear terms are included in the
|
|
equation of free oscillations, the terms of higher order in the amplitude of
|
|
the external force (such as occur if it depends on the displacement x) should
|
|
also be included. We shall omit these terms merely to simplify the formulae;
|
|
they do not affect the qualitative results.
|
|
Let y = wote with E small, i.e. y be near the resonance value. To ascertain
|
|
the resulting type of motion, it is not necessary to consider equation (29.1)
|
|
if we argue as follows. In the linear approximation, the amplitude b is given
|
|
88
|
|
Small Oscillations
|
|
§29
|
|
near resonance, as a function of the amplitude f and frequency r of the
|
|
external force, by formula (26.7), which we write as
|
|
(29.2)
|
|
The non-linearity of the oscillations results in the appearance of an ampli-
|
|
tude dependence of the eigenfrequency, which we write as
|
|
wo+kb2,
|
|
(29.3)
|
|
the constant K being a definite function of the anharmonic coefficients (see
|
|
(28.13)). Accordingly, we replace wo by wo + kb2 in formula (29.2) (or, more
|
|
precisely, in the small difference y-wo). With y-wo=e, the resulting
|
|
equation is
|
|
=
|
|
(29.4)
|
|
or
|
|
Equation (29.4) is a cubic equation in b2, and its real roots give the ampli-
|
|
tude of the forced oscillations. Let us consider how this amplitude depends
|
|
on the frequency of the external force for a given amplitude f of that force.
|
|
When f is sufficiently small, the amplitude b is also small, so that powers
|
|
of b above the second may be neglected in (29.4), and we return to the form
|
|
of b(e) given by (29.2), represented by a symmetrical curve with a maximum
|
|
at the point E = 0 (Fig. 32a). As f increases, the curve changes its shape,
|
|
though at first it retains its single maximum, which moves to positive E if
|
|
K > 0 (Fig. 32b). At this stage only one of the three roots of equation (29.4)
|
|
is real.
|
|
When f reaches a certain value f k (to be determined below), however, the
|
|
nature of the curve changes. For all f > fk there is a range of frequencies in
|
|
which equation (29.4) has three real roots, corresponding to the portion
|
|
BCDE in Fig. 32c.
|
|
The limits of this range are determined by the condition db/de = 8 which
|
|
holds at the points D and C. Differentiating equation (29.4) with respect to
|
|
€, we have
|
|
db/de =
|
|
Hence the points D and C are determined by the simultaneous solution of
|
|
the equations
|
|
2-4kb2e+3k264+2 0
|
|
(29.5)
|
|
and (29.4). The corresponding values of E are both positive. The greatest
|
|
amplitude is reached where db/de = 0. This gives E = kb2, and from (29.4)
|
|
we have
|
|
bmax = f/2mwod;
|
|
(29.6)
|
|
this is the same as the maximum value given by (29.2).
|
|
§29
|
|
Resonance in non-linear oscillations
|
|
89
|
|
It may be shown (though we shall not pause to do so heret) that, of the
|
|
three real roots of equation (29.4), the middle one (represented by the dotted
|
|
part CD of the curve in Fig. 32c) corresponds to unstable oscillations of the
|
|
system: any action, no matter how slight, on a system in such a state causes
|
|
it to oscillate in a manner corresponding to the largest or smallest root (BC
|
|
or DE). Thus only the branches ABC and DEF correspond to actual oscil-
|
|
lations of the system. A remarkable feature here is the existence of a range of
|
|
frequencies in which two different amplitudes of oscillation are possible. For
|
|
example, as the frequency of the external force gradually increases, the ampli-
|
|
tude of the forced oscillations increases along ABC. At C there is a dis-
|
|
continuity of the amplitude, which falls abruptly to the value corresponding
|
|
to E, afterwards decreasing along the curve EF as the frequency increases
|
|
further. If the frequency is now diminished, the amplitude of the forced
|
|
oscillations varies along FD, afterwards increasing discontinuously from D
|
|
to B and then decreasing along BA.
|
|
b
|
|
(a)
|
|
to
|
|
b
|
|
(b)
|
|
f<f
|
|
b
|
|
(c)
|
|
f>tp
|
|
B
|
|
C
|
|
Di
|
|
A
|
|
E
|
|
F
|
|
€
|
|
FIG. 32
|
|
To calculate the value of fk, we notice that it is the value of f for which
|
|
the two roots of the quadratic equation in b2 (29.5) coincide; for f = f16, the
|
|
section CD reduces to a point of inflection. Equating to zero the discriminant
|
|
t The proof is given by, for example, N.N. BOGOLIUBOV and Y.A. MITROPOLSKY, Asymp-
|
|
totic Methods in the Theory of Non-Linear Oscillations, Hindustan Publishing Corporation,
|
|
Delhi 1961.
|
|
4
|
|
90
|
|
Small Oscillations
|
|
§29
|
|
of (29.5), we find E2 = 3X², and the corresponding double root is kb2 = 2e/3.
|
|
Substitution of these values of b and E in (29.4) gives
|
|
32m2wo2x3/31/3k.
|
|
(29.7)
|
|
Besides the change in the nature of the phenomena of resonance at fre-
|
|
quencies y 22 wo, the non-linearity of the oscillations leads also to new
|
|
resonances in which oscillations of frequency close to wo are excited by an
|
|
external force of frequency considerably different from wo.
|
|
Let the frequency of the external force y 22 two, i.e. y = two+e. In the
|
|
first (linear) approximation, it causes oscillations of the system with the same
|
|
frequency and with amplitude proportional to that of the force:
|
|
x(1)= (4f/3mwo2) cos(two+e)t
|
|
(see (22.4)). When the non-linear terms are included (second approximation),
|
|
these oscillations give rise to terms of frequency 2y 22 wo on the right-hand
|
|
side of the equation of motion (29.1). Substituting x(1) in the equation
|
|
= -
|
|
using the cosine of the double angle and retaining only the resonance term
|
|
on the right-hand side, we have
|
|
= - (8xf2/9m2w04) cos(wo+2e)t.
|
|
(29.8)
|
|
This equation differs from (29.1) only in that the amplitude f of the force is
|
|
replaced by an expression proportional to f2. This means that the resulting
|
|
resonance is of the same type as that considered above for frequencies
|
|
y 22 wo, but is less strong. The function b(e) is obtained by replacing f by
|
|
- 8xf2/9mwo4, and E by 2e, in (29.4):
|
|
62[(2e-kb2)2+12] = 16x2f4/81m4w010.
|
|
(29.9)
|
|
Next, let the frequency of the external force be 2= 2wote In the first
|
|
approximation, we have x(1) = - (f/3mwo2) cos(2wo+e)t. On substituting
|
|
in equation (29.1), we do not obtain terms representing an
|
|
external force in resonance such as occurred in the previous case. There is,
|
|
however, a parametric resonance resulting from the third-order term pro-
|
|
portional to the product x(1)x(2). If only this is retained out of the non-linear
|
|
terms, the equation for x(2) is
|
|
=
|
|
or
|
|
(29.10)
|
|
i.e. an equation of the type (27.8) (including friction), which leads, as we
|
|
have seen, to an instability of the oscillations in a certain range of frequencies.
|
|
§29
|
|
Resonance in non-linear oscillations
|
|
91
|
|
This equation, however, does not suffice to determine the resulting ampli-
|
|
tude of the oscillations. The attainment of a finite amplitude involves non-
|
|
linear effects, and to include these in the equation of motion we must retain
|
|
also the terms non-linear in x(2):
|
|
= cos(2wo+e)t. (29.11)
|
|
The problem can be considerably simplified by virtue of the following fact.
|
|
Putting on the right-hand side of (29.11) x(2) = b cos[(wo++)+8], where
|
|
b is the required amplitude of the resonance oscillations and 8 a constant
|
|
phase difference which is of no importance in what follows, and writing the
|
|
product of cosines as a sum, we obtain a term (afb/3mwo2)
|
|
of the ordinary resonance type (with respect to the eigenfrequency wo of the
|
|
system). The problem thus reduces to that considered at the beginning of
|
|
this section, namely ordinary resonance in a non-linear system, the only
|
|
differences being that the amplitude of the external force is here represented
|
|
by afb/3wo2, and E is replaced by 1/6. Making this change in equation (29.4),
|
|
we have
|
|
Solving for b, we find the possible values of the amplitude:
|
|
b=0,
|
|
(29.12)
|
|
(29.13)
|
|
1
|
|
(29.14)
|
|
Figure 33 shows the resulting dependence of b on € for K > 0; for K < 0
|
|
the curves are the reflections (in the b-axis) of those shown. The points B
|
|
and C correspond to the values E = To the left of
|
|
B, only the value b = 0 is possible, i.e. there is no resonance, and oscillations
|
|
of frequency near wo are not excited. Between B and C there are two roots,
|
|
b = 0(BC) and (29.13) (BE). Finally, to the right of C there are three roots
|
|
(29.12)-(29.14). Not all these, however, correspond to stable oscillations.
|
|
The value b = 0 is unstable on BC, and it can also be shown that the middle
|
|
root (29.14) always gives instability. The unstable values of b are shown in
|
|
Fig. 33 by dashed lines.
|
|
Let us examine, for example, the behaviour of a system initially "at rest"
|
|
as the frequency of the external force is gradually diminished. Until the point
|
|
t This segment corresponds to the region of parametric resonance (27.12), and a com-
|
|
parison of (29.10) and (27.8) gives 1h = 2af/3mwo4. The condition 12af/3mwo3 > 4X for
|
|
which the phenomenon can exist corresponds to h > hk.
|
|
+ It should be recalled that only resonance phenomena are under consideration. If these
|
|
phenomena are absent, the system is not literally at rest, but executes small forced oscillations
|
|
of frequency y.
|
|
92
|
|
Small Oscillations
|
|
§29
|
|
C is reached, b = 0, but at C the state of the system passes discontinuously
|
|
to the branch EB. As € decreases further, the amplitude of the oscillations
|
|
decreases to zero at B. When the frequency increases again, the amplitude
|
|
increases along BE.-
|
|
b
|
|
E
|
|
E
|
|
A
|
|
B
|
|
C D
|
|
FIG. 33
|
|
The cases of resonance discussed above are the principal ones which may
|
|
occur in a non-linear oscillating system. In higher approximations, resonances
|
|
appear at other frequencies also. Strictly speaking, a resonance must occur
|
|
at every frequency y for which ny + mwo = wo with n and m integers, i.e. for
|
|
every y = pwo/q with P and q integers. As the degree of approximation
|
|
increases, however, the strength of the resonances, and the widths of the
|
|
frequency ranges in which they occur, decrease so rapidly that in practice
|
|
only the resonances at frequencies y 2 pwo/q with small P and q can be ob-
|
|
served.
|
|
PROBLEM
|
|
Determine the function b(e) for resonance at frequencies y 22 3 wo.
|
|
SOLUTION. In the first approximation, x(1) = -(f/8mwo2) cos(3wo+t) For the second
|
|
approximation x(2) we have from (29.1) the equation
|
|
= -3,8x(1)x(2)2,
|
|
where only the term which gives the required resonance has been retained on the right-hand
|
|
side. Putting x(2) = b cos[(wo+)+8] and taking the resonance term out of the product
|
|
of three cosines, we obtain on the right-hand side the expression
|
|
(3,3b2f(32mwo2) cos[(wotle)t-28].
|
|
Hence it is evident that b(e) is obtained by replacing f by 3,8b2f/32wo², and E by JE, in
|
|
(29.4):
|
|
Ab4.
|
|
The roots of this equation are
|
|
b=0,
|
|
Fig. 34 shows a graph of the function b(e) for k>0. Only the value b=0 (the e-axis) and
|
|
the branch AB corresponds to stability. The point A corresponds to EK = 3(4x2)2-A3)/4kA,
|
|
t It must be noticed, however, that all the formulae derived here are valid only when the
|
|
amplitude b (and also E) is sufficiently small. In reality, the curves BE and CF meet, and at
|
|
their point of intersection the oscillation ceases; thereafter, b = 0.
|